Showing posts with label Sarah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sarah. Show all posts

A Feminism for Our Time

Sarah Bigler
Staff Writer

            When people think of feminism, they think unshaven legs, unstyled hair, bare faces and a loud, clear female voice, usually condemning a society that celebrates men’s rights at the expense of those of women.  They don’t think of high heels.

But first, an admission of guilt. March was Women’s History Month, and as a self-proclaimed feminist, I feel I should have written this article two months ago. Having dropped the ball, I offer this piece as an apology and an attempt to salvage my dignity as both a journalist and as a woman.

Let’s set the record straight. Feminists don’t hate men. After all, some of us even sleep with them.  Some choose to stay home and raise their children. Some of us do actually shave our legs, and some don’t. Some of us have high-powered jobs, some work down the street at your local grocery store. We enjoy sex, we play with makeup, and yes, we wear both high heels and Birkenstocks, blue jeans and pink dresses.

The face of feminism, like any major movement, has evolved since its inception. Some of the issues have remained the same. Women still don’t make the same wages men do for performing the same job, abortion will always be a point of contention and domestic and sexual abuse against women is an ongoing war being fought across the globe.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott and Susan B. Anthony started the “first wave” of feminism in their fight for women’s suffrage. In the late 19th century, they and like-minded men and women started pushing for equal voting rights. They wrote editorials, held protests and rallies, and one woman, the feisty and bold Victoria Woodhull, even ran for President of the United States.

Let women issue a declaration of independence sexually, and absolutely refuse to cohabit with men until they are acknowledged as equals in everything, and the victory would be won in a single week, Woodhull said.

The victory wasn’t won in a week, but the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was passed in August, 1920. Anthony, Mott and many of the fighters of their era had long since died and never saw the fruit of their efforts.

These women, and countless nameless others, directly influenced the sexual revolution, or “second wave” feminism of the 1950s, 60s and 70s. The names most associated with feminism come from this era, such as Gloria Steinem, Betty Freidan, and Simone de Beauvoir.

Women were focused on the right to break out of the home and lead independent, fulfilling lives. Steinem, Freidan, Carolyn Maloney and Alice Paul fought hard for the ultimately doomed Equal Rights Amendment, which would have guaranteed that each civil right bestowed upon men would also be valid for women. Federally, the law never passed, but 22 states have it in their books, and various organizations continue to campaign for the ERA.

These ladies led the Women’s Liberation Movement, which fought for “unofficial” rights for women, in contrast to the specific legal and property rights of their predecessors. These rights included safety in the workplace, legal equalities in a wide range of areas, and, most controversially, sexual and reproductive rights.

This was the generation that, according to legend, burned their bras in protest. They eschewed conventional gender roles, shunned makeup and the Miss America pageants. They demanded the right to play sports professionally and in school, and celebrated the sexual liberation that accompanied the invention of the birth control pill.

Since the late 80s, feminism has faced a backlash.  Many women today don’t identify themselves as “feminist,” disliking the tomboyish and sometimes militant connotation. Other critics, especially those of minority backgrounds, felt the movement didn’t include them and needs to embrace a larger population.

The focus of women’s rights in the 80s and 90s tended to be workplace and linguistically related.

Anita Hill’s 1991 testimony against the unprofessional conduct of Clarence Thomas in front of Congress brought the issue of sexual harassment to the forefront of national politics. The issue has been studied and fought in every workplace ever since.

The women of the 1990s also took charge of the way they were portrayed. Reclaiming derogatory words, such as “bitch,” or “whore,” or “slut,” and made them commonplace. Women chose to change the meanings and connotations of these words rather than remove them from the vernacular entirely.

In the world of “Sex and the City,” Lady Gaga’s “LoveGame,” and the epidemic of the celebrity sex tape, Steinem and Freidan are often drowned out. The women of today, instead of denouncing sexual objectivity and aiming for the right of employment, choose to celebrate their sexuality and refuse to let their opinions be silenced.

Steinem herself has come around to this more liberal, more sensual brand of feminism.

“A liberated woman is one who has sex before marriage and a job afterward,” she said.

In light of these circumstances, it’s unsurprising some women wonder if feminism is still relevant. They ask questions about whether the movement has failed, or succeeded, or is even still worth the fight.

I spent my adolescence considering myself a truly classic feminist. I was, and still am, pro-choice, pro-ERA, and, frankly, pro-feminist. I became so virulent in my beliefs that simply listening to the other side of an issue put me on the defensive.

The problem with this way of thinking is the complete and utter extremity it brought to my personality. This is a characteristic I was horrified to discover about myself, and a trait I generally malign in other people.

 While I still hold most, if not all, of my same beliefs, I like to think my attitude has changed and I’ve mellowed out, at least a little. These days, I’m ready for debate, not dogma.

I’m one of a generation of women navigating their way through the conflicting and ultimately personal views that occur in an era of political correctness and veiled sexism. And sexism still does play a part in America, especially in the political arena.

The election of 2008 showed this to be true. Despite a woman, former Sen. Hillary Clinton, running for president and making to the primaries, and another woman, former Gov. Sarah Palin running for vice president, neither woman could make a move without at least one political commentator mentioning that she was a woman.

Both candidates claimed they had been treated unfairly in their campaign on the basis of their sex. True or not, no one can deny that it’s still a hot button topic.

Feminism is an ongoing and important component of our society. Its effects are all too apparent. According to the U.S. Department of Labor in 2008, women made up around 47 percent of the workforce in America, but still, after 50 years of effort, made only 77 cents to the average man’s dollar for performing the same job.

The numbers are even worse for minorities. Black women make 64 cents to the dollar of a white male. Hispanic women only make about 52 cents to the dollar.

Paradoxically, the more education a woman has, the higher the disparity there is in wages. This is despite making up 51 percent of upper level and higher paying jobs in management and business. Women’s Media, an organization for working women, found that women in high-level professional positions make 72 percent of what men in the same position make.

Domestic and sexual abuse are still, unfortunately, key issues. The American Institute on Domestic Violence estimates half a million women are stalked by a former or current partner per year, and 1,232 women are killed every year in an abusive relationship.

The same organization reports a shocking one in four women will experience domestic abuse or violence in their lifetime. Domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to women, and costs $5.8 billion in physical and mental health bills in the United States each year.

These are just a couple of the many issues plaguing American women today. The National Organization for Women, or NOW, also includes lesbian rights, and diversity and race sensitivity training among the ongoing issues of abortion and economic discrimination.

So are we living in a “postfeminist” world? I hope not.  I certainly hope there hasn’t been a substantial drop in the number of activists working to right the wrongs still ailing America and her women.

Today’s feminists look a lot less like hippies and a lot more like the general population, male and female, black, white and everything in between. We still have a long and bumpy journey ahead of us. But true equality for women cannot just be a pipe dream, something we strive for, but feel we might never reach.

Former first lady and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has spoken often about feminism and the role it has played in her life and in today’s world.

“There cannot be true democracy unless women's voices are heard,” she said in 1997.

“There cannot be true democracy unless women are given the opportunity to take responsibility for their own lives. There cannot be true democracy unless all citizens are able to participate fully in the lives of their country.

Latino films showcased in Waukegan

Sarah Bigler
Staff Writer


      The Genesee Theater and the city of Waukegan are honoring Hispanic contributions to filmmaking with the 26th Annual Chicago Latino Film Festival starting April 23.

      The festival will feature three independent films from different countries over three days. The films being shown are 2009 favorites of the Latin world, hailing from Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay. 

      A CLC panel discussion is planned for 2 to 3:30 p.m. on Saturday, April 24 in room C008 at the Lakeshore campus in Waukegan.

      The title of the panel discussion is “What is the Role of Latino Film Culture in Lake County?” and is free to all students and members of the public. The panelists will include CLC Arts professors, a student filmmaking representative from the college and the director of the Lake County Film Festival.

      A coffee house workshop will also be held from 1 to 3 p.m. on Sunday, April 25 at the Brick CafĂ© and Bookstore. The event is also free and open to the public. Reservations and tickets are not needed for either discussion.

      “Espiral,” or “Spiral,” is the story of a family in the midst of the political drama surrounding the U.S.-Mexico border, and is the first film being screened following the opening night gala on Friday night.

      CLC Cinema Studies professor Chris Cooling is a member of the committee that set up the festival.

      “We've done a good job of highlighting the diversity of the Latino world, as well as its diverse practices of filmmaking,” Cooling said of the festival. “We're hoping that this first event sparks enough interest that we can gradually expand in the years to come.”

      Saturday at 7 p.m. the Genesee will screen “Los Viajes del Viento,” or “The Wind Journeys.” 

      “The second movie caused the most intense debate on our panel,” Cooling said. “I made the point that the intensity of the debate was a good reason to program the film. It’s my personal favorite.”

      “The Wind Journeys” takes place on a road trip with a boy and a “reluctant” father-figure and, according to Cooling, “showcases the great variety” of landscapes and music throughout South America. The film was widely praised at the Cannes and Toronto film festivals and entered into consideration for the 2010 Academy Awards.

      Closing the Latino Festival at 4 p.m. on Sunday is the Uruguayan film “Mal Dia Para Pescar,” or, “A Bad Day to Go Fishing.” The plot involves a fraudulent agent called “The Prince” and a washed-up wrestler who find themselves in over their heads in an adoring town. 

      “The film is downright fun and a fast-paced con artist romp,” Cooling said. “The Scottish-Spanish actor Gary Piquer has already won awards for his portrayal, and a good deal of it is in English.”

      The Opening Night Gala will be held at 5 p.m. on April 23, followed by the screening of the first movie, “Espiral.”  Tickets to the gala are priced at $50, and a three-day package, including the gala and all the movies, is available for $60.  A three-day package not including the opening night party is $20 for adults and $15 for students.

      Students can see an individual film for $6 with a valid ID, and regular adult tickets are $8 each. Tickets are available through the Genesee box office or ticketmaster.com.

Polarized Congress passes health care

Sarah Bigler
Staff Writer


      “This is a big f---ing deal.”

      That’s what Vice President Joe Biden said to President Barack Obama before the signing of the health care bill.

      He wasn’t wrong. On March 23, Obama signed into law the largest social initiative since Medicare was passed 45 years ago. He signed the bill with 22 pens in front of 200 Democratic lawmakers and White House staffers with a smile on his face.

      “This is what change looks like,” Obama said of the bill passing. “That our generation is able to succeed in passing this reform is a testament to the persistence and the character of the American people.”

      This day was long in coming. Obama, along with many members of Congress in recent elections, campaigned on the promise of health care reform. His speech before signing the bill was repeatedly interrupted with shouts of excitement from the audience. 

      Among the witnesses present were Vicki Kennedy, widow of the late Senator Ted Kennedy, and their niece Caroline and son Patrick, who is a member of the House of Representatives. CNN reported that after the bill was signed, the surviving Kennedys walked to Ted’s gravesite and held a small victory party. Ted Kennedy was a tireless proponent of health care reform, and Patrick left a note on his grave. “Dad,” he wrote. “The unfinished work is done.”

      Signing the bill into law was the result of many months spent debating, arguing and rewriting. The health care reform bill was the first major issue taken up by the president since his inauguration, and he finally saw his vision come to fruition.

      The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as it's officially named, was passed in the House by a margin of 219 to 212. It was sent to the House of Representatives for approval after being passed by the Senate on Christmas Eve. 

      The Act will cover 30 to 32 million people who don’t currently have health insurance, including children. It requires most Americans to have health insurance of some kind, and allows 16 million of those people to join Medicare programs.

      The process was marred by instances of inappropriate behavior. Protestors filled the streets outside the Capitol Building, chanting and holding up signs both for and against the bill. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was harassed walking into the building, and John Lewis, a civil rights leader in the 1960s and current congressman was called a nasty racial epithet.

      Perhaps the worst example of name calling wasn’t from citizen protestors, but from inside the House chamber. Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas) shouted “baby killer” at Rep. Bart Stupak as he stepped down the Congressional aisle.  Stupak is a pro-life Democrat from Michigan’s first district who negotiated the tricky subject of abortion relating to the health care bill. 

      Under the provisions accomplished by Stupak, Obama will sign a guarantee that no federal funds will be used to provide abortions. Insurance companies can still choose whether or not to cover abortions in their plans, but federal money will not go toward the procedure. This was a point of contention amongst pro-lifers, but Obama’s agreement doesn’t change anything in the bill or current law, only reinforces it.

      Behind all the partisan bickering and fighting, there is a new law of the land. There are some immediate changes to the health care industry, and also some changes that won’t go into effect for a couple years.

      Among the changes immediately implemented, insurance companies will no longer be able to deny coverage on the basis of a child’s pre-existing conditions. A patient’s coverage will not be dropped due to these conditions, and the Act ends the practice known as rescission. Rescission is when an insurer ends a patient’s coverage even when they’ve kept their policy current.

      The other immediate change is the insurance companies can no longer put a lifetime limit on benefits. Perhaps the most important change for college age kids is that insurers must now cover children of insured parents through age 26, whether or not they’re current students.

      In 2014, more changes will take over. Adults will not be dropped for pre-existing conditions. Most individuals and families will be required to have health insurance. Those who meet certain need requirements will be added to Medicare or will be qualified for subsidies to help pay for their insurance.

      In today’s money, the requirements for free care would be an individual making $14,400 or less, or a family making $29,327. Individuals and families making more than those limits but less than certain amounts will get help paying their insurance through subsidies.

      Also in 2014, wealthy families and individuals who don’t have insurance will be fined $625. Low income people and groups will be exempt from this law. Employers with more than 50 employees will be required to provide insurance, or face a $2,000 fine per employee. By 2020, the prescription drug “doughnut hole” in Medicare will be closed.

      Perhaps the least talked about amendments in the bill are the ones covering restaurants and tanning beds. Chain restaurants that have more than 20 locations, such as McDonald’s and Burger King, are now subject to a law that requires calorie information on the menu. When this goes into effect and the exact regulations will be decided by the Food and Drug Administration. Some cities, such as New York and Los Angeles, already have this law.

      Health care reform also imposes a 10 percent tax increase on the use of indoor tanning beds. Proponents of the measure cite those who use tanning beds have a significantly increased risk of cancer. According to CNN, lawmakers considered taxing all cosmetic procedures, but settled on only taxing tanning beds.

       There are still some revisions to be voted on in the Senate, which are expected to pass quickly- at least in Congressional terms. 

      MSNBC reported there has been violence this week. Rocks and bricks have been thrown through windows of the offices of Democratic leaders across the country. 

      There are still protests happening around the country, and within the walls of Congress, there are still debates and arguments. Change never comes easy in this country, and without doubt, there will be debate for years to come.

      White House Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, posted on Twitter shortly after the event.

      “Powerful moment when the President described the people he was signing this for and for the millions back in control of their health care,” he said.

      “And yes, Mr. Vice-President, you’re right.”

'Vagina Monologues' comes to CLC

Sarah Bigler
Staff Writer


      Looking around the audience of a performance of “The Vagina Monologue” is almost as fascinating as the play itself. Early in the performance there’s a moment where uncomfortable squirming turns to genuine laughter and emotion. Men and women often have difficulty talking about areas “south of the border,” but that disappears into entertainment and reflection.


      On March 11 the CLC Women’s Center put on their first student performance of “The Vagina Monologues.” CLC professors Lynn Harper and Mick Cullen directed the controversial play by Eve Ensler.


      Ensler is an American activist and survivor of sexual abuse. Her best known work, the Vagina Monologues, has been translated into 45 languages and has been performed all over the world.


      The play is a series of monologues originally performed solely by Ensler. The topic of the monologues, now performed by several actresses, is the vagina. The monologues explore topics of sexuality, rape, childbirth, sensuality, menstruation, prostitution, mutilation, several different names for the vagina, and the experience of an orgasm.


      Along with directors Cullen and Harper, the play was organized by the Women’s Center Director, Teresa Aguinaldo, Stephanie Santos Gray, an actor in the production, and other members of the faculty.


      Donations at the door of the show, along with sales of raffle tickets and half the proceeds from a bake sale helped benefit the CLC Women’s Center. The other half of the bake sale proceeds benefits women and children refugees of the war in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The CLC Pride Alliance organized and created the bake sale outside the auditorium.


      “It’s an empowering show,” Aguinaldo said. “Probably just 15 years ago, you couldn’t say ‘vagina’ without getting embarrassed or looking around to see who was listening. But Eve Ensler changed all that.”


      The play has inspired a movement. V-Day, an international day of women’s empowerment and issues, has now been celebrated in 130 countries around the world including Asia, Europe, Africa and certain Middle Eastern countries liberal enough to welcome the play. V-Day is celebrated between Feb. 1 and Apr. 30 every year, and always includes a performance of the “Vagina Monologues.”


      The play includes the monologues, “My Angry Vagina,” a diatribe against tampons, pelvic exams and other uncomfortable things done to the vagina, delivered ferociously by Sheila White. “My Vagina Was My Village,” a two person performance by Emilee McGinn and Michelle Golden, recalls the devastating memories of a Bosnian refugee girl subjected to rape camps.


      Rachel Kelly delivered two monologues, one of which was “Hair,” about the obsession Americans have with pubic hair.


      Anna Chesman delivered “The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could,” a now-homeless woman’s story of the love-hate relationship she experienced with her vagina as a child. After surviving rape and injury, she discovers her sexuality with a 24 year old female neighbor.


      Ruthe Dembinski’s speeches talked about the experiences of a uptight English woman taking a “Vagina Workshop,” and Ensler’s own experiences of witnessing the birth of her first grandchild.


      Gray performed the role of an elderly lady coming to terms with her sexuality in “The Flood.”


      The play includes some disturbing facts about the status of women around the world. Some facts are sensual, like the fact that the clitoris contains 8,000 nerve endings, making it the only human body part meant exclusively for pleasure. The play explains how the clitoris is more sensitive than fingertips, tongue and twice as sensitive as the penis.


      Other vagina facts are not as happy. According to the play, 200,000 American women are raped every year. A staggering number of women, 130 million each year, mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa, are subjected to the horrifying dangerous practice of female genital mutilation where much of the clitoris or labia is cut or removed, usually without anesthetic, with an unclean scalpel, knife or shard of glass.


      CLC’s ensemble cast was made up of women from all walks of life, different backgrounds and opinions. Each woman had her own story that brought her to the performance. Each woman talked about her enthusiasm for the play, and her own feelings of empowerment.


      “We’re a diverse cast,” Dembinski said of her and her cast mates. “We’re different ages, backgrounds, and educational levels. We have a little bit of everything, and no lack of emotion.”


      Dembinski is an aspiring stand-up comedian. She sees this opportunity as a precursor to doing an “open-mic night” at a comedy club, and hopes completing the challenge will boost her confidence in front of an audience.


      Many of the cast members expressed excitement about the opportunity to help out a good cause and increase awareness of women’s issues.


      “I wanted to help the Women’s Center,” actor White said. “I’m really involved in social service.”


      Dazalle Yvette’s monologue talked about a woman’s journey from a heterosexual tax lawyer to lesbian sex worker. It also included a series of demonstrations of orgasms.


      “The hardest part was having to do 19 different types of moans on stage,” she said. “I did the play because I wanted to take a leap. If this isn’t jumping in, I don’t know what is.”


      Michelle Golden talked about the play helped her heal from abuses in her childhood.


      “My experience in this play has changed me,” she said. “I was diagnosed with an anxiety disorder last year. This was a way to challenge myself and speak out.”


      Golden, who has Cerebral palsy and is in a wheelchair, was told by her parents she would never find someone to appreciate her talents.


      “They told me no one would ever love me, that I wasn’t beautiful,” she said. “Now I know never to sacrifice how you feel. And now I’m engaged to a great guy that lets me just relax.”


      Aguinaldo estimates that 20 to 25 percent of CLC students have been victims of some kind of sexual abuse, domestic violence or sexual harassment.


      “That’s so frightening,” she said. “Sometimes women have lived with abuse for so long that they don’t realize that it’s happening to them or that it’s wrong.”


      “First and foremost, we want survivors to know they’re not alone, and know their rights and options,” she said. “The greater community also needs to know so that they can help other people.”


      The whole day came down to helping the Women’s Center help women. Their emergency fund provides women in difficult situations who find themselves financially hurt as well.


      “When it helps the Women’s Center, it makes all the difference,” Dembinski said. “If one girl doesn’t have to pay for her own rape kit because of the money we raised, it’s all worth it.”

Powered by Blogger